USPTO serial 78921939
IMMUNOBALANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2011
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IMMUNOBALANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
SUMIDA-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
Jeffrey H. Kaufman Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Processed foodstuffs, namely, dietary supplements in the form of tablets, capsules, granules, liquid, gelatin or powder mainly consisting of milk, lactic acid bacteria, oligosaccharide, amino acid or peptide for the purpose of helping relieve allergy symptoms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Edible oils and fats; milk; fermented milk; other milk products, namely, cultured milk; meat; eggs; fish and shellfish; frozen vegetables; frozen fruits; meat products, namely, processed meat, dried meat, canned cooked meat, and meat extracts; processed marine products, namely, canned fish, smoked fish, fish cakes, processed fish roe, fish fillets, flakes of dried fish meat, and pickled fish; processed vegetables and processed fruits; fried bean curd, frozen and dried bean curd; jelly made for devils' tongue root; soy milk; bean curd; curry stew; curry soup; [ layer ] * laver * for rice in tea; seasonings; beans, namely, baked beans, canned beans, dried beans; lactic acid drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Refreshing drinks, namely, non-alcoholic drinks in the nature of carbonated beverages and non-alcoholic soft drinks; fruit drinks; vegetable juice for drinking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CALPIS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CALPIS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CALPIS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ASAHI SOFT DRINKS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named IMMUNOBALANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 24, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |