USPTO serial 78922394
DYNATITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DYNATITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
7122 NZ Aalten, NL
7122 NZ Aalten, NL
7122 NZ Aalten, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTINA M. LICURSI
CHRISTINA M. LICURSI WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal plates, tubes, blocks and rings for sealing conduits for pipes and/or cables | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Sealing plugs made primarily of rubber; fire-resistant sealing plugs made primarily of rubber; sealing material, namely gaskets, packings, sheaths, bushing, sleeves, cuffs and paste-like sealants (putty) of rubber, designed to prevent the propagation of fire, fluid or gas along cable and pipelines or ducts; fire-resistant sealing material, namely gaskets, packings, sheaths, bushing, sleeves, cuffs and paste-like sealants (putty) of rubber, designed to prevent the propagation of fire, fluid or gas along cable and pipelines or ducts; sealing rings and sealing muffs made of fire proof rubber material, designed to prevent the propagation of fire, fluid or gas along cable and pipelines or ducts; sealing rings and sealing muffs made of rubber, designed to prevent the propagation of fire, fluids or gas along cable and pipelines or ducts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beele Engineering B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Beele Engineering B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Beele Engineering B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DYNATITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |