Drawing for RIVEAU

USPTO serial 78922501

RIVEAU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIVEAU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly Reddick

Kimberly Reddick Bell, Boyd & Lloyd LLPP.O. Box 1135Chicago, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps for body care, facial creams, facial lotions, hair care products, namely, hair creams, hair lotions, hair gel, hair mousse, shampoo, conditioner; hair care preparations, make-up, make-up remover, make-up pencils, make-up powderACTIVE—
008tweezersACTIVE—
021make-up applicators, make-up sticks for applying make-up, stencils for applying make-up, facial sponges for applying make-up, make-up brushes, hair brushes, hair combsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 22, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance