USPTO serial 78922788
RANDOM ACTS OF PIE-NESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3297956Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- GAN, REBECCAH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RANDOM ACTS OF PIE-NESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
Nashville, TN
American Blue Ribbon Holdings, LLC
Nashville, TN
Other trademarks owned by American Blue Ribbon Holdings, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John B. Greenberg
John B. Greenberg LEWIS, RICE & FINGERSH, L.C.600 Washington AvenueSuite 2500St. Louis, MO 63101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 4, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vicorp Restaurants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vicorp Restaurants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vicorp Restaurants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Blue Ribbon Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named RANDOM ACTS OF PIE-NESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 25, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |