USPTO serial 78922977
EVIL EYE CLOTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVIL EYE CLOTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Naperville, IL
Naperville, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald A. DiCerbo
RONALD A DICERBO MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY500 W MADISON ST FL 34CHICAGO, IL 60661-4544UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; All-purpose carrying bags; Backpacks; Beach bags; Book bags; Luggage; Tote bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bathing suits; Belts; Blazers; Bras; Bustiers; Camisoles; Caps; Caps with visors; Dresses; Footwear; Jackets; Jeans; Knit shirts; Leggings; Panties; Pants; Shirts; Shorts; Skirts; Skull caps; Socks; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat suits; Swim wear; T-shirts; Tank tops; Teddies; Trousers; Under garments; Undershirts; Warm up suits | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Mail order services featuring clothing, headwear, backpacks, carrying bags, luggage, belts, footwear, eyeglasses, sunglasses, and accessories therefore; On-line retail store services featuring clothing, headwear, backpacks, carrying bags, luggage, belts, footwear, eyeglasses, sunglasses, and accessories therefore; Retail stores featuring clothing, headwear, backpacks, carrying bags, luggage, belts, footwear, eyeglasses, sunglasses, and accessories therefore | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |