USPTO serial 78923014
CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Nabor
JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LA SALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603-3590UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Audio broadcasting; Broadcasting programs via a global computer network; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; Cable radio broadcasting; Cable television broadcasting; Communication by telegram; Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Communication via radio, telegraph, telephone and television transmissions; Communications by computer terminals; Communications by mobile phones; Communications by television for meeting; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Communications via fiber-optic networks; Communications via multinational telecommunication networks; Computer aided transmission of information and images; Data communication by electronic mail; Electronic data transmission; Electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network; Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; Electronic transmission of facsimile communications and data featuring encryption and decryption; Electronic transmission of messages and data; Electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; Facsimile transmission; Information transmission by telematic codes; Information transmission by teletypewriters; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Mobile radio communication; Pay-per-view television transmission services; Podcasting services; Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; Providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Providing third party users with access to telecommunication infrastructure; Provision of access to electronic sites; Radio broadcasting; Radio broadcasting information; Radio communication; Radio, telephone, telegraph communication services; Radio program broadcasting; Rental of communication apparatus and implements; Satellite, cable, network transmission of sounds, images, signals and data; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; Telecommunications by e-mail; Telegram transmission; Telematic sending of information; Teleprinting; Television broadcasting; Television broadcasting information; Transmission and reception of database information via the telecommunication network; Transmission of information by data communications for assisting decision making; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Transmission of information in the audiovisual field; Transmission of information through video communication systems; Transmission of messages over electronic media; Transmission of sound, picture and data signals; Transmission of sound, video and information; Transmission, reception and processing of coded and emergency signals; Video broadcasting; Video teleconferencing; Wireless broadband communication services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |