USPTO serial 78923319
USERVUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3506629Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with USERVUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Duby, Jr.
James R. Duby, Jr. DUBY LAW FIRM3511 COOLIDGE RD STE 200EAST LANSING, MI 48823-6390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software, namely, a remote usability testing web application that provides the capability of conducting one on one facilitated sessions using a remote facilitator, remote participant and multiple observers for use in the field of user testing, user research, design feedback, and collaborative projects conducted by web and software developers and usability professionals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 2006 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on line non-downloadable computer software, namely, a remote usability testing web application service that provides the capability of conducting one on one facilitated sessions using a remote facilitator, remote participant and multiple observers for use in the field of user testing, user research, design feedback, and collaborative projects conducted by web and software developers and usability professionals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TechSmith Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by TechSmith Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by TechSmith Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named USERVUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |