USPTO serial 78923432
THE SAN CLUB RESIDENTIAL, COUNTRY CLUB, GOLF & SPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SAN CLUB RESIDENTIAL, COUNTRY CLUB, GOLF & SPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. COURTNEY, ESQ.
JOHN P COURTNEY ESQ ANDREWS KURTH LLP600 TRAVIS ST STE 4200HOUSTON, TX 77002-2929UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment and resort services and facilitites featuring golf, tennis, and swimming; COUNTRY CLUB services and FACILITIES. | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | RESORT SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING FOOD, DRINKS AND TEMPORARY LODGING. | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | SPA SERVICES, NAMELY, TREATMENT, HEALTH, AND BODY CARE SERVICES. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSATLANTICO DE SERVICIOS Y DESARROLLOS, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named THE SAN CLUB RESIDENTIAL, COUNTRY CLUB, GOLF & SPA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |