USPTO serial 78923613
BIOSTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOSTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna W. Manville
ANNA W MANVILLE ARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 12TH ST NWIP DOCKETINGWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Natural stone products, namely, granite tiles and slabs for use in construction; Natural stone products, namely, granite tiles and slabs for use on floors, walls, countertops and bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |