USPTO serial 78923970
THE SANDWICH BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3652732Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2009
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SANDWICH BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew V. Leitch
Andrew V. Leitch SONGSTAD & RANDALL LLP2201 Dupont Drive, Suite 100Irvine, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services, namely, dine-in and carry-out restaurant services; catering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |