Drawing for VETERINARY APPAREL COMPANY

USPTO serial 78924781

VETERINARY APPAREL COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VETERINARY APPAREL COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus P. Dolce

MARCUS P DOLCE PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMOOR SEPOST OFFICE BOX 2567, MI 49501,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035mail order and on-line catalog services featuring veterinary clothingACTIVEDec 31, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 2, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 24, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 23, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 25, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 14, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance