USPTO serial 78924816
COUCH POTATO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUCH POTATO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food supplements; Herbal supplements; Vitamins | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Carrying cases specially adapted for pocket calculators and cellphones; Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; CD cases; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglasses; Eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords and head straps which restrain eyewear from movement on a wearer; Holders for compact discs; Protective carrying cases for portable music players, namely, MP3 players; Remote controls for radio, television, entertainment centers; Specialty holster for carrying cellular phones, pagers, personal digital assistants and remote controls; Sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Beach balls; Covers for golf clubs; Golf balls; Golf tees; Remote control toys, namely, cars, race cars, airplanes, boats; Sport balls; Toy figures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Old Toledo Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Old Toledo Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named COUCH POTATO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |