Drawing for AMERICAN MASTERS

USPTO serial 78925001

AMERICAN MASTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN MASTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori Stockton Kozak

Lori Stockton Kozak BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of real estate companies; franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion of real estate companies, real estate advertising services, real estate sales managementACTIVE
036Real estate investment services; financial services, namely mortgage planning, mortgage banking, mortgage brokerage, mortgage lending; real estate services, namely, real estate appraisal services, real estate consultation services; real estate agency services, real estate listing services, real estate management, real estate lending servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 7, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 22, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 9, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance