USPTO serial 78925934
BEAM ME UP, SCOTTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAM ME UP, SCOTTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Santalone
Michael J. Persson Lawson & PerssonPO Box 712Lanconia, NH 03247UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, anoraks, beachwear, belts, blazers, blouses, blousons, bodysuits, boleros, bottoms, camisoles, cardigans, chemises, coats, coveralls, dresses, footwear, infant wear, jackets, jeans, jogging suits, kimonos, leggings, lingerie, neckwear, neckties, leather coats, leather jackets, overalls, pajamas, panties, pants, polo shirts, pullovers, robes, sarongs, scarves, shirts, shorts, skirts, sleepwear, sun sleeves, slips, stockings, surf wear, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatshirts, swimwear, tank tops, tennis wear, tights, tops, t-shirts, trousers, underclothes, undergarments, underwear, vests, gloves, shawls, wraps, and headgear, namely, bandanas, caps, beanies, hats, headbands, hoods, visors and sweat bands | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |