USPTO serial 78926062
RENATO RATTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with RENATO RATTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
12064 La Morra, Cuneo, IT
LA MORRA, CUNEO, IT
12064 La Morra, Cuneo, IT
12064 La Morra, Cuneo, IT
RENATO RATTI - ANTICHE CANTINE DELL'ABBAZIA DELL'ANNUNZIATA - S.A.S. DI PIETRO RATTI & C.
LA MORRA, CUNEO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Groos
Richard J. Groos King & Spalding LLP500 West 2nd Street, Suite 1800Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1969 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RENATO RATTI - ANTICHE CANTINE DELL'ABBAZIA DELL' ANNUNZIATA - S.A.S. DI PIETRO RATTI - MASSIMO MARTINELLI & C.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETA' AGRICOLA RATTI S.S
- Other trademarks owned by RENATO RATTI - ANTICHE CANTINE DELL'ABBAZIA DELL' ANNUNZIATA - S.A.S. DI PIETRO RATTI - MASSIMO MARTINELLI & C.
- Other trademarks owned by RENATO RATTI - ANTICHE CANTINE DELL'ABBAZIA DELL' ANNUNZIATA - S.A.S. DI PIETRO RATTI - MASSIMO MARTINELLI & C.
- Other trademarks owned by RENATO RATTI - ANTICHE CANTINE DELL'ABBAZIA DELL'ANNUNZIATA - S.A.S. DI PIETRO RATTI & C.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named RENATO RATTI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 10, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |