Drawing for PURPOSE CASH LOAN

USPTO serial 78926126

PURPOSE CASH LOAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURPOSE CASH LOAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Segeda T. Ranjeet

SEGEDA T. RANJEET TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPBANK OF AM PLZ., 600 PEACHTREE ST., N.E.SUITE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, credit card services, debit card services, and providing temporary loans including short term temporary loansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 18, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance