USPTO serial 78926691
CAFE BRAVO COFFEE ROASTING CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2007
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAFE BRAVO COFFEE ROASTING CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
Temecula, CA
Other trademarks owned by Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
Temecula, CA
Other trademarks owned by Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
Temecula, CA
Other trademarks owned by Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Newcomb
Michael W. Newcomb Rosenstein & Hitzeman28600 MERCEDES ST STE 100TEMECULA, CA 92590-2745UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee, flavoring syrup, and cocoas; blended powders, namely, chocolate blended powders, caramel blended powders, vanilla blended powders and chai tea flavored blended powders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
- Other trademarks owned by Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
- Other trademarks owned by Cafe Bravo Coffee Roasting Company
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CAFE BRAVO COFFEE ROASTING CO.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |