USPTO serial 78926919
FROGGEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FROGGEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Imperial Beach, CA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2008 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |