USPTO serial 78926996
ROODEBERG - SOUTH AFRICA'S MOST EXPORTED PREMIUM RED BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3810926Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROODEBERG - SOUTH AFRICA'S MOST EXPORTED PREMIUM RED BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
Paarl, ZA
Other trademarks owned by KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
Paarl, ZA
Other trademarks owned by KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
Paarl, ZA
Other trademarks owned by KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E APOLZON Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by KWV Intellectual Properties (Pty) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ROODEBERG - SOUTH AFRICA'S MOST EXPORTED PREMIUM RED BLEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |