USPTO serial 78927043
1 HOTEL & RESIDENCES FORT LAUDERDALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 1 HOTEL & RESIDENCES FORT LAUDERDALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen G. Janoski
STEPHEN G JANOSKI ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | LEASING, RENTAL, AND MANAGEMENT OF CONDOMINIUMS, APARTMENTS, VILLAS AND RESIDENTIAL HOMES; LEASING, RENTAL, AND MANAGEMENT OF CONDOMINIUMS, APARTMENTS, VILLAS AND RESIDENTIAL HOMES IN VACATION AND RESORT COMMUNITIES; REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | CASINOS, NAMELY, GAMBLING AND GAMING SERVICES; LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, LIVE PERFORMANCES BY MUSICAL BANDS AND LIVE COMEDY SHOWS; NIGHT CLUB SERVICES; HEALTH CLUB SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL EXERCISE; LEISURE CLUB SERVICES, NAMELY, COUNTRY CLUB AND GOLF CLUB SERVICES; PROVISION OF SPORT AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING ENTERTAINMENT EXHIBITIONS IN THE NATURE OF COMEDY ACTS, DANCE ACTS, THEATER ACTS, PLAYS, STAGE PRODUCTIONS, MAGIC SHOWS, PERFORMANCE ART SHOWS; THEATRICAL BOOKING AGENCIES, NAMELY, THEATER, OPERA AND CONCERT TICKET RESERVATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | HOTELS; CONDOMINIUM HOTELS; HOTEL SERVICES; RESORT HOTEL SERVICES; SPA SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATIONS AND MEALS TO CLIENTS OF A HEALTH OR BEAUTY SPA; RESTAURANTS; BARS; RESTAURANT AND BAR SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | HEALTH SPA SERVICES FOR HEALTH AND WELLNESS OF THE BODY AND SPIRIT OFFERED AT HEALTH RESORTS; HEALTH SPA SERVICES, NAMELY, COSMETIC BODY CARE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SH GROUP GLOBAL IP HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by CGG, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by CGG, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named 1 HOTEL & RESIDENCES FORT LAUDERDALE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |