USPTO serial 78927261
FANSTART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FANSTART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudine Meredith-Goujon
Claudine Meredith-Goujon PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON & GARRISON LL1285 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019-6031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Hand held unit for playing video games; stand alone video game machines; action figures and accessories therefor; action skill games; athletic equipment, namely, mouth guards, striking shields, hand wraps, protective pads for athletic use; athletic sporting goods, namely, athletic wrist and joint supports; baby rattles; backboards for basketball; balloons; baseball bats; baseball gloves; baseball mitts; baseballs; basket balls; basketball goal sets; basketball nets; basketball table top games; basketballs; bath toys; battery operated action toys; batting gloves; bean bags; bendable toys; board games; card games; cases for play accessories; catchers' masks; catchers' mitts; chest protectors for sports; children's multiple activity toys; construction toys; crib mobiles; elbow guards for athletic use; electric action toys; electronic educational game machines for children; footballs; handballs; handball gloves; hockey gloves; hockey pucks; hockey sticks; home plates; infant toys; inflatable toys; jigsaw puzzles; jock straps; jump ropes; kites; body protectors for football and hockey; elbow pads for athletic use; knee pads for athletic use; leg guards for athletic use; shoulder pads for athletic use; marbles; mechanical toys; mobiles for children; mouth guards for athletic use; musical toys; party games; play tents; play tunnels; playground balls; plush toys; pop up toys; pull toys; push toys; ride-on toys; sand toys; skateboards; soccer balls; softball bats; softball gloves; softball mitts; sport balls; talking toys; tennis balls; tennis racket covers; tennis rackets; tennis balls; toy action figures and accessories therefor; toy boxes; toy building blocks; toy noisemakers; toy vehicles; umpire protection equipment; volley balls; volleyball game playing equipment; volleyballs; wind-up toys; yo-yos; golf bags; face masks for hockey and wrestling; poker cards, poker chips; covers for golf clubs; golf balls; golf clubs; golf gloves; tennis balls; tennis nets; tennis rackets; boxing bags; boxing gloves; punching balls for boxing practice; cricket balls; snow boards; bags for skateboards; skateboards; rugby balls; lacrosse ball bags; lacrosse balls; lacrosse sticks; paintball guns; paintballs, namely, ammunition for paintball guns; swimming boards; swimming equipment, namely, racing lanes and starting blocks; gymnastic training tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |