USPTO serial 78927323
AMBIENTNAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMBIENTNAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesse P. Suplizio
JESSE P SUPLIZIO SUPLIZIO LAW OFFICE3420 E SHEA BLVD STE 200PHOENIX, AZ 85028-3348UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MARINE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS SOLD AS A UNIT CONSISTING OF ON-BOARD DISPLAY SCREENS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR MARINE NAVIGATION, MILITARY, AND INDUSTRIAL USE; NAVIGATION AND GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS SOLD AS A UNIT CONSISTING OF DISPLAY SCREENS, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, AND MOUNTED COMPUTER INTERFACE DEVICES FOR USE IN A VARIETY OF INDUSTRIES; DISPLAY SCREENS, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, AND DASH-MOUNTED COMPUTER INTERFACE DEVICES, EACH SOLD SEPARATELY, FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH MARINE NAVIGATION AND GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |