USPTO serial 78927658
YO!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YO!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Bryan
Robert H. Cameron Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson101 N. Tryon StreetSuite 1900Charlotte, NC 28246Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | LIP BALM, BREATH FRESHENERS; NON-MEDICATED BREATH FRESHENING DISSOLVING STRIPS OR TAPE | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | LOOSE LEAF TEA, TEA BAGS AND BOTTLED HERBAL ENERGY TEA FOR MEDICINAL PURPOSES; NUTRACEUTICALS, FOR USE AS A DIETARY SUPPLEMENT, CHEWABLE VITAMIN TABLETS, DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | GIFT CARDS, GREETING CARDS, POST CARDS, POSTERS, STICKERS, DECALS AND STATIONERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LUGGAGE, GYM AND ATHLETIC BAGS, DUFFEL BAGS, BACKPACKS, KNAPSACKS, BOOKBAGS AND DRAWSTRING POUCHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TOWELS, BED BLANKETS, AND THROWS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, PANTS, COATS, JACKETS, CAPS AND SOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | FLOOR MATS, FLOOR MATS FOR VEHICLES, AND RUGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | SNACK MIX, CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PROCESSED FRUITS, PROCESSED NUTS AND/OR RAISINS; POTATO CHIPS, PROTEIN BASED NUTRIENT DENSE SNACK BARS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | LOOSE LEAF TEA, TEA BAGS AND BOTTLED HERBAL ENERGY TEA; CANDY BARS, CANDY, CANDY MINTES, PEPPERMINT CANDY, CHOCOLATE, CHOCOLATE BARS, CHOCOLATE CANDY, BUBBLE GUM, CHEWING GUM, CANDY CHEWS, GUM SWEETS; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRACKERS, PRETZELS, CANDIED NUTS AND/OR POPPED POPCORN; CORN CHIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | LIGHT BEVERAGES, NAMELY BOTTLED DRINKING WATER, FLAVORED WATERS, SOFT DRINKS AND SOFT DRINK MIXES IN THE FORM OF POWDERS, SYRUPS, AND CONCENTRATES, AND JUICES, ENERGY DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by YO BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by YO! BOYZ, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named YO!
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |