USPTO serial 78927712
SIMPLY DELICIOSO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPP, HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLY DELICIOSO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALI R. LATIFI
ALI R. LATIFI TUCKER & LATIFI, LLPSuite 5E160 East 84th StreetNew York, NY 10028Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Anchovy paste, artichoke paste, blended oil for food, fruit-based spreads, hazelnut spread, jams, jellies, marmalades, nut butter, olive oil, olive pastes, peanut butter, peanut oil, pepper oil, pickles, processed olives, processed onions, processed peppers, processed pimientos, snack dips (excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips), and sour cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |