Drawing for EZBORDERZ

USPTO serial 78927873

EZBORDERZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZBORDERZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

P. Jay Hines

P. Jay Hines Cantor Colburn LLPSuite 5101800 Diagonal RoadAlexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand tools, namely, plastic holders for holding and placing wallpaper borders during installationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 25, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 15, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance