USPTO serial 78927892
MASTERFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2010
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MASTERFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eau Claire, WI
Eau Claire, WI
Eau Claire, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles J. Meyer
Charles J. Meyer Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal portable tool boxes, namely, hand boxes and hand boxes with drawers; metal, painted and stainless steel tool storage, namely, tool chests, intermediate tool chests, rolling tool chests | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2007 |
| 007 | Power tools in the nature of corded and cordless portable power hand tools, namely, drills, saws, routers; power fastening tools, namely, pneumatic coil utility nailers, pneumatic crown staplers, pneumatic palm nailers, pneumatic straight brad nailers, pneumatic angled brad nailers, pneumatic headless pinners in the nature of pneumatic headless pin nail guns, pneumatic straight framing nailers, pneumatic angled framing nailers, pneumatic plastic cap nailers, pneumatic crown staplers, pneumatic coiled roofing nailers, pneumatic straight finish nailers, pneumatic angled finish nailers, pneumatic fine wire staplers; angle grinders, power screw guns; impact wrenches, namely, cordless battery operated impact wrenches that are rechargeable; sanders, namely, electric detail sanders, electric belt sanders, electric random orbital sanders, electric sheet sanders, pneumatic straight line sanders; hammer drills, namely, electric corded and battery-operated drill hammers and impact drivers; corded and cordless bench top tools, namely, bench grinders; drill presses; table top saws, planers, compound miter saws, cutoff saws; stationary tools, namely, drill presses, all of the foregoing being power driven | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2009 |
| 008 | Bench vises, namely, manually operated bench vises made of cast metal; metric and SAE non-power premium hand tools, namely, sockets, socket sets, ratcheting drivers, namely, drivers that attach to sockets to provide leverage to tighten or loosen without having to reposition the tool on a nut, bolt or screw; extensions that provide extra length or reach, positioned between the ratcheting driver and the socket; screwdrivers, hammers, hex wrenches, open-end wrenches, pliers; hand tools in the nature of impact sockets or impact socket sets, said sockets manufactured of extra-thick and hardened steel to withstand the rigors of the use with an impact wrench, sold in sets and in multiple sizes; box end wrenches, combination wrenches, hand tools in the nature of hex head sockets wrenches, namely, square-drive sockets equipped with 6 sided drives inserted for removing socket cap screws and other materials; universal joint extensions, namely, extensions combined with universal-joints to provide flexibility to off-angle approaches and ratcheting; hand tools in the nature of hex bit sockets, adjustable wrenches, adjustable clamps; knives in the nature of carpet knives, folding knives; hack saws, socket bit sets in the nature of square-drive sockets sold in multiple size sets and also available in 6, 8, and 12 point designs; socket drive adaptors, namely, short extension pieces used to adapt a smaller ratcheting driver to a larger drive socket, or the reverse; speed wrenches, nut drivers; pry bar sets in the nature of sets of hardened steel bars used to align or act as a leverage and move heavy objects with force, all of the foregoing being hand tools | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2010 |
| 009 | [ Levels, namely, hand levels in the nature of box levels, masonry levels, I-Beam levels, and torpedo-styled levels ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2009 |
| 020 | [ Plastic portable tool boxes, namely, hand boxes ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Menard, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Menard, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Menard, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named MASTERFORCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |