Drawing for KIDKUPZ

USPTO serial 78927945

KIDKUPZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIDKUPZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Epstein

ROBERT L EPSTEIN EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST RM 820NEW YORK, NY 10165-0820UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Candy coated medicine dispensing cupsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 30, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 30, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 18, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 3, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 9, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 9, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance