USPTO serial 78928143
RWDI GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2008
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RWDI GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
Guelph, CA
Other trademarks owned by Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
Guelph, CA
Other trademarks owned by Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
Guelph, CA
Other trademarks owned by Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Mason, Esq.
Monica B. Mason, Esq. Trenam Law101 E. Kennedy Blvd.Suite 2700Tampa, FL 33602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technology consultation and research in the field of engineering with regards to wind loads, wind pressures, pedestrian comfort, exhaust stack and air intake design, acoustics, noise and vibration, ventilation, snow and ice impacts, sun, shade, glare, indoor air quality, snow loading, snow drifting and thermal comfort relating to commercial and residential buildings, bridges, institutional, health care, science and technology facilities, entertainment venues, airports, bridges, bus and rail stations, parking facilities, roads, highways and tunnels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RWDI GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |