USPTO serial 78928777
Serial No. 78928777
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78928777?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vercelli (VC), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nils E. Pedersen
NILS E PEDERSEN WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books and booklets, namely, books and booklets featuring information about photography, history, geography, plants, animals, ancient civilizations, science and sports; notebook paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2007 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |