USPTO serial 78928967
RHEUMINATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RHEUMINATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward G. Black
TRADEMARK DOCKETING SPECIALIST ROPES & GRAY LLPONE INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110-2624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services in the fields of healthcare and medicine, namely educational services in the nature of developing, arranging, and conducting educational programs pertaining to the disease commonly known as lupus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |