Drawing for PLACE LUMIERE

USPTO serial 78929026

PLACE LUMIERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLACE LUMIERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryce K. Earl, Esq.

Bryce K. Earl, Esq. Santoro, Driggs, Walch, Kearney, Holley & Thompson400 South Fourth Street, Third FloorLas Vegas, NV 89101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal key chains; metal key rings; metal key chain tags; metal jewelry boxes; metal money clips; and statuettes of non-precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance