Drawing for TURF REVOLUTION NATURALLY FRIENDLY TOUGH TURF.

USPTO serial 78929779

TURF REVOLUTION NATURALLY FRIENDLY TOUGH TURF.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TURF REVOLUTION NATURALLY FRIENDLY TOUGH TURF.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori K. Hall

LORI K HALL; GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON HAMILTON; ONC - ONTARIOL8P 4Z51 MAIN ST W,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001fertilizersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 10, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 23, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance