Drawing for UNIQUE PERFORMANCE CONCEPTS

USPTO serial 78929878

UNIQUE PERFORMANCE CONCEPTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIQUE PERFORMANCE CONCEPTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter V. Schroeder

PETER V SCHROEDER CRUTSINGER & BOOTH LLC1601 ELM ST STE 1950DALLAS, TX 75201-4704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring custom and specialty automobiles and parts therefor; customizing existing land vehicles and parts thereforACTIVESep 30, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 7, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 7, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance