Drawing for LEADERMARK

USPTO serial 78930086

LEADERMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEADERMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Building construction and repairACTIVEMar 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 5, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 17, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2007CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 31, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2007CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 24, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 24, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 22, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance