USPTO serial 78930480
CO´M CHÁY GÀ CHÀ BÔNG CRUNCHY TASTY NUTRITIOUS GOLDEN RICE WITH DEHYDRATED CHICKEN ARROZ QUEMADO CON POLLO SECO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CO´M CHÁY GÀ CHÀ BÔNG CRUNCHY TASTY NUTRITIOUS GOLDEN RICE WITH DEHYDRATED CHICKEN ARROZ QUEMADO CON POLLO SECO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rice-based snack foods | PARTIALLY PAID | Apr 7, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |