USPTO serial 78930857
HANGERLOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HANGERLOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
QUEBEC, CA
QUEBEC, CA
QUEBEC, CA
John Thomas Batts Enterprises (Canada) Ltd.
Lasalle, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by John Thomas Batts Enterprises (Canada) Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W. LEWIS Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP8500 Leesburg PikeSuite 7500Tysons, VA 22182Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HANGERLOGIC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HANGERLOGIC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HANGERLOGIC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by John Thomas Batts Enterprises (Canada) Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HANGERLOGIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |