Drawing for CARTRIDGE FIREPLACE

USPTO serial 78930867

CARTRIDGE FIREPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARTRIDGE FIREPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye, Alfred W. Zaher, Cindy A. Elliott, David M. Perry, Emily J. Barnhart, Bruce D. George, Sean W. Dwyer, Lisa Casey Spaniel, Megan E. Spitz and Zachary A. Aria

Timothy D. Pecsenye Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square9th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-6998

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004artificial firelogsACTIVEFeb 1, 2006
011fireplace inserts (gel fuel)ACTIVEFeb 1, 2006
019non-metal fire mantels for fireplacesACTIVEFeb 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 13, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 12, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance