USPTO serial 78930871
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
RIVERSIDE, CA
RIVERSIDE, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY W. MCFARLAND
LARRY W MCFARLAND KEATS, MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVD PHBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper party products, namely, party favors, party bags, party decorations and party hats; gift wrapping paper; paper ribbons and bows; metallic gift wrap and gift wrapping paper; scented paper drawer liners, paper gift tags, paper napkins, paper table cloths and linens; printed and related matter, namely, posters, calendars, temporary tattoos, stickers, decals, iron-on or plastic transfers, bumper stickers, paper bags and paper gift bags, note cards, postcards, picture postcards, greeting cards, gift cards, blank note cards, stationery, note pads, bookmarks, envelopes; paper photograph and coin albums, paper photo frames and paper picture frames; magazines, leaflets, journals, newsletters, booklets, books, pamphlets and brochures | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |