USPTO serial 78930940
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The Maryland Hospital Association, Inc.
Elkridge, MD
Other trademarks owned by The Maryland Hospital Association, Inc.
The Maryland Hospital Association, Inc.
Elkridge, MD
Other trademarks owned by The Maryland Hospital Association, Inc.
The Maryland Hospital Association, Inc.
Elkridge, MD
Other trademarks owned by The Maryland Hospital Association, Inc.
SOUTH BEND, IN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole M. Murray
Nicole M. Murray Quarles & Brady LLP300 North LaSalle StreetSuite 4000Chicago, IL 60654| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONDUCTING QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT TO COMPARE PERFORMANCE OF HOSPITALS TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF SERVICES, AND BUSINESS CONSULTATION IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; PROVIDING BUSINESS CONSULTATION IN CONNECTION WITH MEDICAL INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, COLLECTING, COMPARING, AND AGGREGATING AGGREGATE AND PATIENT-LEVEL DATA FROM HOSPITALS AND HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AND PREPARING REPORTS THEREWITH TO ANALYZE PERFORMANCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1988 |
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ANALYZING INDICATORS OF QUALITY HEALTH CARE AND HEALTH CARE RELATED SERVICES AND FOR PROVIDING ON-LINE MEDICAL DATABASES FEATURING CRITERIA AND COMPARISONS OF AGGREGATE AND PATIENT-LEVEL DATA FROM HOSPITALS AND HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2003 |
| 044 | PROVIDING MEDICAL INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, COLLECTING, COMPARING, AND AGGREGATING AGGREGATE AND PATIENT-LEVEL DATA FROM HOSPITALS AND HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AND PREPARING REPORTS THEREWITH TO ANALYZE PERFORMANCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |