USPTO serial 78931304
BOOGIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOOGIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Emeryville, CA
Emeryville, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal key rings and chains; hand-held mirrors; plaques made of bone, ivory, plastic, wax, or wood; soft sculpture wall decorations; decorative mobiles; plastic and metal stands for displaying or holding various types of toys and sporting equipment; plastic figurines; toy boxes; plastic and wood figurines; plastic identification tags; folding sports seats and stools; footstools; inflatable pillows; inflatable furniture; beanbag style furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, bathing suits, belts, neckties, suspenders, bandanas, infant and toddler sleepwear, bathrobes, night shirts, pajamas and loungewear, beach cover-up dresses, cloth diaper sets, knit dresses with pants sets, shorts and top sets, skirt/panty combinations, socks, play suits, coveralls, union suits, collarless shirts, shorts, pants and slacks, shirts; jackets, namely, wind-resistant jackets and nylon shells; sports uniforms; sweaters; parkas; turtlenecks; mittens; gloves; underwear; rompers; jerseys; headwear and scarves; ear muffs, ear bands and headbands; hosiery; rain ponchos and jackets; bath thongs; visors; aprons; ski and cloth bibs; T-shirts; sweatshirts; sweatpants; coats; pullovers; ski suits; golf shirts and hats; blazers; legwarmers; evening tops; jeans; leotards; workout and sports apparel, namely, tank tops, sports bras; ski masks; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, slippers, and beach sandals; headgear, namely, hats, caps, baseball caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |