Drawing for SMARTCUT

USPTO serial 78932209

SMARTCUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTCUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle M. Globerman

Kyle M. Globerman Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP100 North Tryon Street, 42nd FloorIP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202-4000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electrosurgical equipment, instruments and accessories; namely, electrosurgical generators, disposable and reusable electrodes, active electrodes, dispersive electrodes, loops, forceps, pencils, adapters, hand and foot switches, handles, cables, cords, and smoke evacuators and related accessories; namely, tubing, fittings, filters, canisters and masksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 16, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 4, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 3, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 19, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 10, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 14, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Mar 27, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 25, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance