Drawing for ILOOP MOBILE

USPTO serial 78932298

ILOOP MOBILE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3578077Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 17, 2009
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ILOOP MOBILE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer H. Hamilton

ILOOP MOBILE INC55 SOUTH MARKET STSUITE 1560SAN JOSE, CA 95113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery platform for wireless contentSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJan 6, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jan 14, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 21, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 13, 2009REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2009CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 4, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 3, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance