USPTO serial 78932347
MULTI INVERTER CHILLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTI INVERTER CHILLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osaka-shi, Osaka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418
JERALD E NAGAE, REG. NO 29,418 CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PL1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Chiller device for use in chilling liquids by using heat exchange between refrigerants of chillers and the liquids for use in industrial plants and laboratories; chilling equipment, namely, a device for use in chilling liquids by using heat exchange between refrigerants of chillers and the liquids for use in industrial plants and laboratories; freezing machines, namely, freezing showcases; freezers; cooling appliances, namely, electric space cooling apparatus for household purposes; refrigerating machines; refrigerating cabinets; air cooling apparatus, evaporative air cooling units; cooling installations for liquids, namely a device that cools liquids by using heat exchange between refrigerants from chillers and liquids; cooling installations for water, namely, a device that cools water by using heat exchange between water from chillers and liquids; air conditioning apparatus for industrial purposes; air conditioning units | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |