Drawing for SHOT ME UP!

USPTO serial 78932427

SHOT ME UP!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOT ME UP!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex Hernandez

Alex Hernandez SHOT ME UPPO BOX 110233CARROLLTON, TX 75011-0233UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Beverages made of tea; Green tea; Japanese green tea; Tea; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoringACTIVEJul 15, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2008MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
May 20, 2008ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Oct 23, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 2, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 2, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 5, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance