USPTO serial 78932443
STARTEK INTELLIGENT ENTERPRISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STARTEK INTELLIGENT ENTERPRISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Denver, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Ryan
MARK A RYAN RYAN PATENT LAW9030 RAVEN OAKS DROMAHA, NE 68152UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | "StarTek Intelligent Enterprise" will provide consulting and services for data image/capture and storage, telecommunications infrastructure development, and telephone, web, chat, and email customer service/customer contact (including technical and service support), data collection, order issuance, order management, service activation, billing verification, credit card processing, accounts receivable management, and customer loyalty programs | ACTIVE | May 22, 2006 |
| 038 | "StarTek Intelligent Enterprise" will provide consulting and services for data image/capture and storage, telecommunications infrastructure development, and telephone, web, chat, and email customer service/customer contact (including technical and service support), data collection, order issuance, order management, service activation, billing verification, credit card processing, accounts receivable management, and customer loyalty programs | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | May 22, 2006 |
| 042 | "StarTek Intelligent Enterprise" will provide consulting and services for data image/capture and storage, telecommunications infrastructure development, and telephone, web, chat, and email customer service/customer contact (including technical and service support), data collection, order issuance, order management, service activation, billing verification, credit card processing, accounts receivable management, and customer loyalty programs | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | May 22, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |