USPTO serial 78932566
CAROLINA PICK 3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CAROLINA PICK 3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
North Carolina State Lottery Commission
Cary, NC, US
Other trademarks owned by North Carolina State Lottery Commission
North Carolina State Lottery Commission
Cary, NC, US
Other trademarks owned by North Carolina State Lottery Commission
North Carolina State Lottery Commission
Raleigh, NC, US
Other trademarks owned by North Carolina State Lottery Commission
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David D. Kalish
David D. Kalish Coats & Bennett, PLLC1400 Crescent GreenSuite 300Cary, NC 27518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | lottery services, namely, organizing, conducting and administering periodic drawings and games of chance for awarding monetary and other prizes; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games of chance, for awarding monetary and other prizes | ACTIVE | Aug 8, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by North Carolina State Lottery Commission
- Other trademarks owned by North Carolina State Lottery Commission
- Other trademarks owned by North Carolina State Lottery Commission
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CAROLINA PICK 3
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |