CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BUNNIES BABY-SOFT DIAPERS

USPTO serial 78932653

BUNNIES BABY-SOFT DIAPERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUNNIES BABY-SOFT DIAPERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Himelstein

DAVID HIMELSTEIN LAW OFFICE OF DAVID HIMELSTEINPO BOX 28337SAN DIEGO, CA 92198-0337UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Disposable diapersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 27, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance