USPTO serial 78933263
ROSEBLOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with ROSEBLOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY M. KEATS
ANTHONY M. KEATS Keats Gatien, LLP120 S. El Camino Drive, Suite 207Beverly Hills, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, motion picture production, motion picture distribution, television program production, television program distribution, production of audio-visual works for use on the Internet, namely, dramatic, musical and comedy performances, dramatic musical and comedy videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials, production of audio-visual works for use by mobile communication technology, namely, dramatic, musical and comedy performances, dramatic musical and comedy videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials | ACTIVE | Apr 8, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2021 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |