Drawing for ORGANIC REVOLUTION

USPTO serial 78933767

ORGANIC REVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANIC REVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathy J. Futrowsky

Cathy J. Futrowsky Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, L.C.101 South Hanley Road, Suite 1700St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Organic beauty and body care products, namely, cosmetics, bath oils, cosmetic creams, cleansing creams, skin care creams, face creams, perfumed creams, cosmetic oils, cosmetic pencils, rouges, lipstick, lip gloss, lip balm, lip stain, cream eye shadows, powder eye shadows, foundations, loose face powder, pressed face powder, mascara, soaps, perfumed soaps, sunscreen, sun-protecting preparations, sun-tanning preparations, suntan lotions, disinfecting perfumed soaps, eau de perfume, perfume, perfume oils, essential oils as perfume for laundry purposes, liquid perfumes, nail varnish and nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes, perfumed talcum powder, perfuming sachets, pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes, pre-moistened cosmetic wipes, rose oil for cosmetic purposes, shampoos, toners, topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic beauty masks, cosmetic skin masks, cosmetic facial masks, cosmetic body masks, hair conditioners and hair treatments, namely, hair care preparations, hair dye, hair nourishers, hair tonic and hair styling gel, and make-up kits comprised of combinations of the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance