USPTO serial 78933998
TELEFONICA DOMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELEFONICA DOMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perla M. Kuhn
Perla M. Kuhn Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLPOne Battery Park PlazaNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOME ALARM SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR HOME AUTOMATION APPLICATION AND DEVICES, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING HOME AUTOMATION OF HOME ALARM SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE WITH INTERACTIVE AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY FOR INTERACTING, READING DATA, CONTROLLING AND MANAGING HOME AUTOMATED SYSTEMS, NAMELY, HOME AUTOMATED ALARM SYSTEMS; DOMESTIC SURVEILLANCE, NAMELY, ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC VIDEO SURVEILLANCE INSTALLATIONS; TEMPERATURE CONTROLLERS, NAMELY, DIGITAL THERMOSTATS, ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS; HUMIDITY CONTROLLERS, NAMELY, WATER FILTER CONTROLLERS; COMPUTERS, COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTERS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMMUNICATIONS SERVERS, COMPUTER ACCELERATOR BOARD; CAMERAS; MOTION DETECTORS, NAMELY, INFRARED MOTION DETECTORS OR MOTION DETECTORS USED FOR ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY SYSTEMS; SECURITY ALARMS; PC AND WEB INTERFACE, NAMELY, INTERFACE SOFTWARE FOR SUPPORTING THE ABOVE SECURITY APPLICATION AND COMPUTER INTERFACE BOARDS, INTERFACE CIRCUITS, AND NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICES FOR SUPPORTING THE ABOVE SECURITY APPLICATION AND DEVICES; TELEVISION SETS FOR SECURITY SYSTEMS; RADIOS; RADIO RECEIVERS; RADIO TRANSMITTERS; MOBILE TELEPHONES; RECORD PLAYERS; AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE PLAYERS; VIDEO RECORDERS, NAMELY, DIGITAL, CASSETTE VIDEO RECORDERS, OPTICAL DISC DRIVES, OPTICAL DISC READERS; PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT FOR DOMESTIC USE, NAMELY, CAMERAS, FILM, FILTERS, FLASHBULBS, PROJECTORS; REPEATERS FOR RADIO AND TELEVISION STATIONS; AERIALS FOR RADIO AND TELEVISION; FIRE EXTINGUISHERS; MODEMS, FAX MACHINES, TELEPHONE APPARATUS; ACCESS CONTROL AND ALARM MONITORING SYSTEMS; CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF DIGITAL THERMOSTATS, AIR CONDITIONING, HEATING, VENTILATION AND DRYING CONTROL DEVICES; CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF DIGITAL THERMOSTATS FOR COOLING EQUIPMENT, AND A PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER (PLC) WITH INPUT AND OUTPUT FEATURES FOR TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY, WHICH WORKS WITH A REMOTE DIGITAL READ OUT CONTROLLER; ELECTRONIC CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR MACHINES; FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE TO CONTROL BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL, ACCESS AND SECURITY SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR THE ENABLING OF ACCESS OR ENTRANCE CONTROL; COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO CONTROL AND IMPROVE COMPUTER AND AUDIO EQUIPMENT SOUND QUALITY; ELECTRIC CONTROL PANELS; MEASURING AND CONTROL DEVICES FOR AIR CONDITIONING TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (BASED ON INTENT-TO-USE AND SPAIN REG. NO. 2721567) BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES; (BASED ON INTENT-TO-USE) BUSINESS ADVISORY SERVICES, CONSULTANCY AND INFORMATION; ARRANGING FOR OTHERS THE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, HOME SECURITY SYSTEMS AND CONSUMER GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | (BASED ON INTENT-TO-USE AND SPAIN REG. NO. 2721567) INSTALLATION SERVICES OF COMPONENTS FOR AUTOMATED HOME CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY, TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, AND ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS; (BASED ON INTENT-TO-USE) CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING HOME APPLIANCES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, TELEPHONIC AND TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION SERVICES CONSISTING OF LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, GRAPHICS BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPHIC TRANSMISSIONS; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT; RENTAL OF MESSAGE TRANSMISSION DEVICES, NAMELY, TELEPHONES, FACSIMILE MACHINES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSIONS OF MESSAGES AND DATA; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLIGENT HOMES SYSTEMS, NAMELY, HOME SECURITY SYSTEMS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED HOME CONTROLLER SYSTEMS, NAMELY, TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, AND ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS; TECHNOLOGIC AND SCIENTIFIC SERVICES FOR DOMESTIC SYSTEMS, NAMELY, CONSULTANCY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HOME SECURITY; TECHNOLOGY SUPERVISION AND INSPECTION IN THE FIELD OF HOME SECURITY SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION; ENGINEERING AND SYSTEM ANALYSIS IN THE FIELD OF HOME SYSTEMS, NAMELY, DOMESTIC SECURITY SYSTEMS; ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HOME SYSTEMS, NAMELY, HOME SECURITY SYSTEMS; PROVIDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION UPDATES OF HOME SECURITY SYSTEMS VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Telefonica, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TELEFONICA DOMO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |